Light Obstruction Notice, South London

Our clients, residents of a block of flats in South London, were served with a Light Obstruction Notice (LON) by a developer after 18.5 years of uninterrupted light enjoyment. The developer aimed to prevent our clients from acquiring a right to light under the Prescription Act 1832 by interrupting the 20-year period of enjoyment. Our clients sought our assistance to challenge the notice and protect their rights.

The legal issue centred on whether the Light Obstruction Notice was served within the permissible timeframe. According to section 3(4) of the Rights of Light Act 1959, the relevant period includes 18 years and one day, after which the right to light can be effectively argues. We needed to prove that the notice was untimely and that our clients' right to light was valid.

We conducted a detailed review of the timeline and the specifics of the notice. Our analysis confirmed that our clients had enjoyed uninterrupted light for over 18 years and 1 day, and it was deemed that the notice was disputable based on the act. We issued proceedings seeking a declaration to remove the notice, arguing that it was served too late to be effective.

During the litigation process, we engaged in strategic negotiations and presented compelling evidence supporting our clients' position. Key legal precedents included Regan v. Paul Properties DPF No 1 Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1391, which emphasised the criteria for actionable interference and the right to seek an injunction. The developer, realising the strength of our case and the potential legal repercussions, agreed to mediation to resolve the dispute.

In the mediation, we secured a significant settlement for our clients, compensating them for the loss of light and ensuring their rights were protected. The compensation reflected the potential impact on their properties and the importance of maintaining their right to light.

This case highlights the critical role of precise legal interpretation and timely action in rights to light disputes. Our effective challenge to the Light Obstruction Notice and strategic use of litigation resulted in a favourable outcome for our clients, protecting their long-established rights and securing substantial compensation.